Log in

No account? Create an account
Personality Type. (Really??) - alley_skywalker [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Personality Type. (Really??) [Apr. 14th, 2011|10:08 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

Stolen from methleigh   and regulus_kat 

I'm actually a bit suspicious about the accuracy of this but I do find it amusing that it identified me as introverted but wanting to be extroverted. Because that's kind of true...

Jung Explorer Test
Actualized type: ISTJ
(who you are)
ISTJ - "Trustee". Decisiveness in practical affairs. Guardian of time- honored institutions. Dependable. 11.6% of total population.
Preferred type: ESTJ
(who you prefer to be)
ESTJ - "Administrator". Much in touch with the external environment. Very responsible. Pillar of strength. 8.7% of total population.
Attraction type: ESFJ
(who you are attracted to)
ESFJ - "Seller". Most sociable of all types. Nurturer of harmony. Outstanding host or hostesses. 12.3% of total population.

Take Jung Explorer Test
personality tests by similarminds.com


From: reg_flint
2011-04-15 09:24 am (UTC)
Quite a different reaction than janus and I. I like the differences. You obviously are more complex than us narrow INTJs. ;)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: alley_skywalker
2011-04-15 10:35 am (UTC)
Haha, not sure if it's that I'm so complex, though I guess it's a nice way of looking at it. IDK, given the research I have done on this, the letters seem to fir mostly, but the way they are described in the short descriptions kinda throws me. I mean, I am dependable but not traditionalist in any way. Though I guess, that may also be effected by the fact that I'm only about 50% of each of those things so... Also, the type that I'm attracted to...makes it seem like I like airhead social butterflies. And I guess I do feel a bit more at ease with those people initially but as far as forming relationships and especially when it comes to the sort of men I'm attracted to I would say that's not right at all...
Heh. Go figure.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: reg_flint
2011-04-15 10:47 am (UTC)
Go by what you know the letters mean, not what they tell you to think. I known you must hate for people to think and decide for you. Thanks Jung and Meyers-Briggs, but don't think for my friend!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)